universal music group

Metro Boomin Celebrates Universal Music Group’s TikTok Departure

by

In a surprising turn of events, renowned producer Metro Boomin has expressed his relief over the recent decision by Universal Music Group (UMG) to sever ties with TikTok. The news, which surfaced on Tuesday (January 30), revealed a disagreement leading to the removal of UMG’s entire catalog from the popular social media platform. Reacting to the announcement, one Twitter user noted, “Wow, just like that, the TikTok era of music is over.” Metro Boomin stumbled upon the tweet and responded with a GIF featuring LeBron James exclaiming, “It’s About Damn Time,” a sentiment shared by many in the music industry.

Furthermore, taking the opportunity to elaborate on his perspective, Metro Boomin later posted his thoughts on the matter. “I love the creativity and appreciation the kids show for the music on TikTok, but I don’t like the forced pandering from artists and labels that results in these lifeless and soulless records,” he expressed. The producer’s candid remarks shed light on the dichotomy within the music industry’s relationship with TikTok. While acknowledging the platform’s ability to showcase creativity and generate appreciation for music among younger audiences, Metro Boomin highlighted his disdain. He perceives the artificial and insincere approach by some artists and labels in creating content specifically tailored for TikTok.

Read More: Metro Boomin 7 Best Beats

Metro Boomin Is Not A Fan Of TikTok Era Of Music

Furthermore, the decision by UMG to part ways with TikTok has sparked conversations. People are debating about the evolving dynamics between the music industry and social media platforms. Metro Boomin’s perspective adds a valuable voice to the ongoing discourse. Emphasizing the delicate balance between authentic artistic expression and strategic marketing efforts in the digital age.

Moreover, as the TikTok era undergoes a transformation with major players like UMG stepping back, it remains to be seen how this shift will impact the music landscape and the creative freedom of artists. Metro Boomin’s candid take serves as a glimpse into the complexities of navigating the intersection of artistry and digital platforms. Urging for a more genuine and soulful approach in the creation of musical content for the next generation. What are your thoughts on this situation? Let us know on HNHH!

Read More: Metro Boomin Shows Gratitude To Billboard

The post Metro Boomin Celebrates Universal Music Group’s TikTok Departure appeared first on HotNewHipHop.

Muni Long Calls Out UMG As It Removes Music From TikTok

by

Earlier this week, Universal Music Group threatened to pull its artists’ music from TikTok. Reportedly, this is all over a contract dispute, and Muni Long isn’t having it. The performer took to social media today to weigh in on the debacle, making it clear that she’d prefer for her music to stay on the platform. “I mean it’s not like they are refusing to support my music until I prove that it’s valuable by investing my own money and maybe possibly lucking up on a hot TikTok trend or anything like that,” she captioned a clip of herself, looking undoubtedly fed up.

“Universal Music Group said,” text in the clip also reads alongside the audio, “That song. Y’all know which one I’m talking about. Wrap it up by the weekend.” Unfortunately, the platform wasn’t able to reach an agreement with UMG. The company demanded fair compensation for artists, “protecting human artists from the harmful effects of AI,” and more.

Read More: Muni Long Net Worth 2023: What Is The Singer Worth?

Muni Long Shares Her Thoughts On UMG’s TikTok Takedowns

@munilong

My therapist not answering again 😵‍💫

♬ original sound – jay

TikTok shared a statement in response, accusing UMG of being greedy, and putting their needs ahead of those of artists and their fans. “It is sad and disappointing that Universal Music Group has put their own greed above the interests of their artists and songwriters,” the statement reads. “Despite Universal’s false narrative and rhetoric, the fact is they have chosen to walk away from the powerful support of a platform with well over a billion users that serves as a free promotional and discovery vehicle for their talent.”

It continued, “TikTok has been able to reach ‘artist-first’ agreements with every other label and publisher. Clearly, Universal’s self-serving actions are not in the best interests of artists, songwriters and fans.” What do you think of Muni Long weighing in on UMG removing several of its artists’ songs from TikTok? Do you agree with her? Share your thoughts in the comments section down below, and keep an eye on HNHH for more updates.

Read More: TikTok Calls UMG Greedy Amid Its Plans To Pull Music Over Contract Dispute

[Via]

The post Muni Long Calls Out UMG As It Removes Music From TikTok appeared first on HotNewHipHop.

Is TikTok Removing Music?

by
tiktok
Getty Image

Let’s cut to the chase: Yes, TikTok has removed a ton of music from its platform. If you haven’t heard, the licensing agreement between TikTok and Universal Music Group expired yesterday, and as a result, all UMG artists‘ music must be removed or TikTok could face legal action for copyright infringement. That means artists like Taylor Swift, Drake, The Weeknd, Ariana Grande, Kendrick Lamar, J. Cole, and many, many, MANY more have been nixed, and no one is quite sure when or if they’ll be back, because UMG is adamant that TikTok hasn’t been negotiating in good faith.

Why Did UMG Remove Its Artists From TikTok?

Long story short, UMG’s leadership doesn’t feel that TikTok is offering fair market value for its artists. UMG also argues that while TikTok is building its own music platform, TikTok Music, and working on AI tools that may help users imitate real-life artists, it’s also undermining the value of any new licensing agreement, since the app could soon be flooded with more songs like AI-generated Drake song “Heart On My Sleeve.” This has been a pain point for the entire recording industry as these tools proliferate and possibly endanger fans’ interest in waiting for (and buying) the real artists’ actual songs.

In an open letter published on the company’s website on Tuesday (January 30), UMG wrote:

TikTok is trying to build a music-based business, without paying fair value for the music.

On AI, TikTok is allowing the platform to be flooded with AI-generated recordings—as well as developing tools to enable, promote and encourage AI music creation on the platform itself – and then demanding a contractual right which would allow this content to massively dilute the royalty pool for human artists, in a move that is nothing short of sponsoring artist replacement by AI.

Further, TikTok makes little effort to deal with the vast amounts of content on its platform that infringe our artists’ music and it has offered no meaningful solutions to the rising tide of content adjacency issues, let alone the tidal wave of hate speech, bigotry, bullying and harassment on the platform. The only means available to seek the removal of infringing or problematic content (such as pornographic deepfakes of artists) is through the monumentally cumbersome and inefficient process which equates to the digital equivalent of “Whack-a-Mole.”

While TikTok denied these accusations in a statement sent to Billboard, it also doesn’t appear that either company has any intentions to budge for the foreseeable future.

Why Aren’t Drake’s Songs On TikTok?

by
drake grimacing
Getty Image

Millions of people have developed the subconscious habit to open TikTok first thing in the morning, and if that’s you, you might notice that TikTok sounds different today, February 1: Drake is among many artists whose catalogs are no longer available under the “Sounds” tab to soundtrack a TikTok.

Here’s why.

Why Aren’t Drake’s Songs On TikTok?

In short, Universal Music Group (UMG) wasn’t bluffing. On Tuesday, January 30, UMG posted an open letter to address its expiring contract with TikTok.

“In our contract renewal discussions, we have been pressing them on three critical issues — appropriate compensation for our artists and songwriters, protecting human artists from the harmful effects of AI, and online safety for TikTok’s users,” it reads, in part. UMG additionally relayed that “TikTok attempted to bully us into accepting a deal worth less than the previous deal” during negotiations, leading to UMG no longer licensing UMG artists’ catalogs to TikTok.

UMG is one of the most vast label umbrellas in music. So, while Drake is signed to Republic Records, Republic falls under the UMG umbrella. Therefore, Drake’s music was stripped from TikTok.

TikTok released its own (much shorter) statement on Tuesday, as seen below:

“It is sad and disappointing that Universal Music Group has put their own greed above the interests of their artists and songwriters.

Despite Universal’s false narrative and rhetoric, the fact is they have chosen to walk away from the powerful support of a platform with well over a billion users that serves as a free promotional and discovery vehicle for their talent.

TikTok has been able to reach ‘artist-first’ agreements with every other label and publisher. Clearly, Universal’s self-serving actions are not in the best interests of artists, songwriters and fans.”

Goodbye Taylor Swift, Drake, Billie Eilish, And So On: UMG Has Officially Removed Its Artists’ Music From TikTok

by
TikTok logo
Getty Image

It happened: Universal Music Group has removed its artists’ songs from TikTok. As of today (February 1), official songs from artists signed to UMG labels no longer appear under the “Sounds” tab on the TikTok app, and previously published videos that featured those songs now have muted audio.

Impacted artists include Taylor Swift, Drake, The Weeknd, Bad Bunny, SZA, Olivia Rodrigo, Steve Lacy, Billie Eilish, Kendrick Lamar, Harry Styles, Rosalía, Ariana Grande, Justin Bieber, Adele, U2, Elton John, J Balvin, Pearl Jam, Bob Dylan, Post Malone, and many others.

TikTok and UMG had a licensing agreement that expired yesterday (January 31), and the day before it did, there were clear indications that negotiations on a new contract were not going well.

UMG shared an open letter about the situation, which read in part:

“As our negotiations continued, TikTok attempted to bully us into accepting a deal worth less than the previous deal, far less than fair market value and not reflective of their exponential growth. How did it try to intimidate us? By selectively removing the music of certain of our developing artists, while keeping on the platform our audience-driving global stars.

TikTok’s tactics are obvious: use its platform power to hurt vulnerable artists and try to intimidate us into conceding to a bad deal that undervalues music and shortchanges artists and songwriters as well as their fans.

We will never do that.”

TikTok then shared a response that reads in full:

“It is sad and disappointing that Universal Music Group has put their own greed above the interests of their artists and songwriters.

Despite Universal’s false narrative and rhetoric, the fact is they have chosen to walk away from the powerful support of a platform with well over a billion users that serves as a free promotional and discovery vehicle for their talent.

TikTok has been able to reach ‘artist-first’ agreements with every other label and publisher. Clearly, Universal’s self-serving actions are not in the best interests of artists, songwriters and fans.”

At the moment, it’s not clear when or if a new licensing agreement between TikTok and UMG will be reached, and when/if the artists’ music will return to TikTok.

Which UMG Artists Will Be Removed From TikTok?

by
drake
Getty Image

Beef between two major media companies was made public yesterday (January 30), and the feud could have a noteworthy impact on the day-to-day content people consume.

TikTok and Universal Music Group have a licensing agreement that expires today, and this agreement allows UMG songs to appear on the TikTok platform and be utilized in videos from TikTok users. Negotiations on a new contract have apparently been going poorly, as indicated by the open letters both companies shared criticizing each other. If a new deal isn’t reached, music by UMG artists could soon leave TikTok.

Which UMG Artists Will Be Removed From TikTok?

Let’s start by looking at what UMG is: Broadly speaking, it’s a massive company that owns a ton of recognizable record labels, including but not limited to Interscope, Geffen, Capitol, Def Jam, Island, Polydor, Republic, and Virgin Music Group.

So, presumably, in the event that a new licensing agreement is not reached, all acts on those labels would see their music leave TikTok. That includes so many hit-making artists, like Taylor Swift, Drake, The Weeknd, Bad Bunny, SZA, Steve Lacy, Billie Eilish, Kendrick Lamar, Harry Styles, Rosalía, Ariana Grande, Justin Bieber, Adele, U2, Elton John, J Balvin, Pearl Jam, Bob Dylan, and Post Malone.

Those artists have an estimated 950 trillion streams between them (note: exaggerated estimate for comedic effect only), and a ton of beloved acts not even mentioned above are also under the UMG umbrella. So, should their music be wiped off of TikTok, it would be a noticeable loss for the platform’s users.

Why Is UMG Removing Its Artists From TikTok?

by
taylor swift
Getty Image

If you’ve been on TikTok anytime in the past couple of days, the odds are high you’ve seen some of your favorite creators fretting about an upcoming change that could result in devastating potentially millions of videos on the platform. If TikTok can’t reach a deal to renew its music licensing agreement with Universal Music Group, the label says it plans to pull its entire catalog from the app, resulting in any video utilizing UMG artists’ songs to be muted, beginning when the agreement expires today. Otherwise, TikTok could open itself to legal liability for copyright infringement. So…

Why Is UMG Removing Its Artists From TikTok?

In an open letter published on the company’s website on Tuesday (January 30), UMG expresses a number of concerns about an ongoing partnership with the app. Chief among them is ensuring fair monetary value for its artists’ work as TikTok seeks to launch its own music-based business (naturally). Meanwhile, UMG also says it has concerns about hate and harassment on the app and TikTok not taking a firm stance when it comes to “AI”-generated works, a controversial topic these days.

UMG alleges that “TikTok proposed paying our artists and songwriters at a rate that is a fraction of the rate that similarly situated major social platforms pay” and that it “demanded a contractual right which would allow [AI] content to massively dilute the royalty pool for human artists.” This is while TikTok itself is developing AI tools that’d make it easier to do so.

Labels under UMG include Interscope and its subsidiaries, the Capitol Music Group umbrella, Republic Records, Island Records, Def Jam, and more. UMG artists include some of the biggest in the world: Ariana Grande, Bad Bunny, Billie Eilish, Drake, Elton John, Kendrick Lamar, Post Malone, SZA, Taylor Swift, and more.

However, pulling these acts from TikTok could be risky for the label as well; the app has increasingly become one of the biggest drivers for new singles and artists to gain popularity. For example, JID, who is signed to Dreamville under Interscope, has experienced a massive surge of interest in his song “Surround Sound” due to a TikTok trend in which creators tape their phones to their ceilings and dance under them (it’s sillly, but hey, it works). Meanwhile, older songs often find second lives on the app, such as The Weeknd’s “Die For You” and Miguel’s “Sure Thing.”

TikTok itself pointed this out in its response, telling Billboard, “It is sad and disappointing that Universal Music Group has put their own greed above the interests of their artists and songwriters. Despite Universal’s false narrative and rhetoric, the fact is they have chosen to walk away from the powerful support of a platform with well over a billion users that serves as a free promotional and discovery vehicle for their talent. TikTok has been able to reach ‘artist-first’ agreements with every other label and publisher. Clearly, Universal’s self-serving actions are not in the best interests of artists, songwriters and fans.”

TikTok recently agreed to a licensing deal with Warner Music Group (of which Uproxx is an independent subsidiary) last July, allowing TikTok to use its catalog on the TikTok Music platform, saying that the deal would benefit artists. It remains to be seen how UMG pulling out will affect its business and artists, but TikTok wouldn’t be getting away unscathed, as a huge part of the appeal for its users is supporting their videos with popular music.

Lucian Grainge Net Worth 2023: What Is The Universal Music Group CEO Worth?

by

Lucian Grainge stands as a titan in the music industry, revered for his remarkable contributions and transformative impact. With an estimated net worth of $250 million, as reported by Celebrity Net Worth, Grainge’s journey is a testament to his unparalleled vision and dedication within the music realm.

Read More: Lyor Cohen Net Worth 2023: What Is The Music Executive Worth?

The Trailblazing Career In Music

lucian grainge
(Photo by Lester Cohen/Getty Images for Universal Music Group)

Born on February 29, 1960, in London, Lucian Grainge’s passion for music began at an early age. His journey in the industry commenced when he joined PolyGram in the late ’70s, marking the start of an illustrious career. His strategic prowess and keen understanding of the evolving music landscape propelled him to prominent positions within Universal Music Group (UMG). Grainge’s visionary leadership as the Chairman and CEO of UMG since 2011 has been pivotal in steering the company to unprecedented success. Moreover, his ability to adapt to digital shifts and harness the power of technology revolutionized UMG, making it the world’s leading music company.

Philanthropy & Humanitarian Contributions

Sir Lucian Grainge
(Photo by Randy Shropshire/Getty Images for The Recording Academy)

Beyond his professional accomplishments, Lucian Grainge is actively engaged in philanthropic initiatives. His dedication to various charitable causes, such as music education programs and humanitarian aid, underscores his commitment to giving back to society. Additionally, Grainge’s efforts in supporting emerging artists and nurturing talent highlight his desire to foster the next generation of musical innovators.

Read More: The Weeknd Signs Massive Long-Term Deal With Universal Music Group

Personal Life & Legacy

Sir Lucian Grainge
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA – JUNE 11: Sofia Richie, Elliot Grainge, Caroline Grainge and Chairman and CEO of Universal Music Group Sir Lucian Grainge attend the British Consulate’s celebration of Her Majesty the Queen’s Platinum Jubilee on June 11, 2022 at the British Consulate General Residence in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by Lester Cohen/Getty Images for British Consulate Los Angeles and Universal Music Group)

Lucian Grainge’s personal life remains relatively private, with a focus on his influential role in the music industry. Married to Caroline Grainge, he maintains a low-key persona outside of his professional endeavors. His legacy, however, is entrenched in his indelible mark on the music landscape, shaping the careers of countless artists and influencing the global music market.

Impact & Financial Milestones

Grainge’s net worth of $250 million is a testament to his strategic acumen and enduring influence in an ever-evolving industry. His ability to navigate technological disruptions and adapt to changing consumer preferences has not only elevated his wealth but also solidified his legacy as a music industry magnate.

In summary, Lucian Grainge’s estimated net worth of $250 million signifies his extraordinary journey and profound impact on the music industry. His visionary leadership, philanthropic endeavors, and strategic contributions have reshaped the musical landscape, leaving an indelible mark on generations to come. Overall, Grainge stands as an emblem of success and innovation, showcasing the immense potential for influence within the realm of music.

The post Lucian Grainge Net Worth 2023: What Is The Universal Music Group CEO Worth? appeared first on HotNewHipHop.

The Drake & The Weeknd AI-Generated Song Was Removed From DSPs After A Statement From Universal Music Group

by
drake and the weeknd
Getty Image

It was fun while it lasted, but it looks like the era of AI-generated reproductions of rappers’ voices online is already facing its end. As I predicted a couple of months ago, it only took the right/wrong artist being unwillingly exploited for profit before the labels stepped in, shutting down some of the more notable tracks.

“Heart On My Sleeve,” one such track that had gone viral after being posted on DSPs, was the subject of a takedown request by Universal Music Group, which had it pulled from streamers. The track garnered attention for pairing the voices of Canadian artists Drake and The Weeknd for a song about The Weeknd’s ex Selena Gomez; it was a reunion of sorts for two artists who were once a dynamic duo but have since seemingly kept each other at arm’s length after a falling out.

Drake, it should be noted, wasn’t laughing when an AI-generated cover of his voice rapping Ice Spice’s “Munch” came to his attention. It’s just one of many fan-created joke tracks, which even include a phony Eminem verse on a David Guetta song.

And while proponents said “Heart On My Sleeve,” created by anonymous TikToker ghostwriter977, sounded just like something the two performers would actually make, detractors derided the song for only doing so on a surface level, throwing in additional criticism for listeners who praised it, calling them nothing short of racist for downplaying the true creativity that goes into hip-hop (you don’t see, for instance, AI-generated pop-punk or country music going viral for sounding “authentic”).

In a statement to Billboard, UMG decried the practice of generative AI copies of artists’ vocals, saying:

The training of generative AI using our artists’ music (which represents both a breach of our agreements and a violation of copyright law) as well as the availability of infringing content created with generative AI on DSPs, begs the question as to which side of history all stakeholders in the music ecosystem want to be on: the side of artists, fans and human creative expression, or on the side of deep fakes, fraud and denying artists their due compensation. We’re encouraged by the engagement of our platform partners on these issues – as they recognize they need to be part of the solution.

And hey, look: The irony of a major label complaining about “denying artists their due compensation” is not lost on me here. (Uproxx is an independent subsidiary of Warner Music Group.) But they’ve got a point: AI doesn’t just cut out the middleman (in this case, the labels), it also cuts out artists, who don’t get a say in the sort of subjects these fan-generated AI reproductions will ultimately indulge in (it’s only a matter of time until someone turns Kanye’s borderline neo-Nazi rants into a song, sung by an artist like Beyoncé or Rihanna). So, it’s probably best someone steps in sooner rather than later — at least to get some sort of legal framework in place so artists have recourse when they’re inevitably “forced” to “say” something they never said.

Questlove And Black Thought Are Accused Of Fraud In A Lawsuit From The Estate Of Late The Roots Bassist Leonard Hubbard

by
Questlove Black Thought Nordstrom NYC Flagship Opening Party 2019
Getty Image

Music titans Questlove, Black Thought, Live Nation, and Universal Music Group have been named in an explosive fraud lawsuit. According to Rolling Stone, Questlove (real name Ahmir Thompson) and Black Thought (real name Tariq Trotter), co-founders of hip-hop group The Roots, the group’s manager Shawn Gee, and band employee Munir Nuriddin are being accused of working together to “scheme to defraud” the estate of the band’s late bassist Leonard Hubbard’s widow and estate out of money owed to them.

After forming Grand Negaz, Inc. to manage the band’s business dealings in 1993, a financial agreement was made to clearly state ownership percentages to ensure everyone knew their respective compensation splits. Thompson and Trotter took 37 percent of stakeholders’ interest, while member rapper Malik Smart (who died in 2020) and Hubbard retained 17 percent each. However, in addition to that, the lawsuit claims Hubbard was to be granted 25 percent of the group’s recording and publishing earnings, as well as a 33 percent stake in the band’s touring performance company.

The lawsuit presented by Hubbard’s widow and estate is seeking “restitution for property, money, and benefits” that were not provided to him as outlined in the paperwork. While the matter is being litigated, they are requesting that the courts “freeze” The Roots’ trademark “until a value can be determined for the brand.”

Hubbard departed from the group in 2007 to seek medical care after being diagnosed with blood cancer, and later died in 2021. The suit alleges that beginning in 2014 up to the current day, Thompson, Trotter, and others, “through a pattern of racketeered behavior, fraudulently converted, divested and absconded with monies lawfully belonging to the Plaintiff Decedent.”

The lawsuit also accuses the musicians of forming a new business, Legendelphia, in 2013, to allegedly transfer funds from their business Grand Negaz, all without the approval of Hubbard. As for where Live Nationa and Universal Music Publishing Group is named, the suit accuses Gee of “deactivating Hubbard’s personal royalty account.” It also accuses that Gee, Thompson, and Trotter of “sending a letter be written from Legendelphia to Universal Music Publishing Group to divert Hubbard’s royalties to Legendelphia” instead of Grand Negaz, Inc.

No public statement has been released by The Roots, Thompson, or Trotter. All parties declined Rolling Stone‘s request for comment.