Drake “Taylor Made” Freestyle: Did He Cross A Line With AI Tupac & Snoop Dogg?

It’s been a hell of a time for fans of Hip Hop. The number of diss tracks that have emerged in 2024 has been quite a lot. Not that we’re complaining, though. The shake-up has led to some of the most exciting disses in a while, and we’ve had to grasp every single detail about a ton of rapper feuds. The crazy thing, however, is that they all seem to have broken out all at once within the industry.  However, while most of these feuds have been met with praise, Drake’s latest effort, “Taylor Made Freestyle,” hasn’t been warmly received. And this boils down to his use of AI on the track

In The Beginning…

The spark that ignited the rap beef was J. Cole’s mention of Kendrick Lamar in “The Big Three” on the track “First Person Shooter.” Kendrick subsequently dropped a surprise verse as a response on Future and Metro Boomin’s “Like That.” J. Cole continued the diss by discrediting Lamar’s discography on “7 Minute Drill.” However, in a surprising feat, he eventually retracted the track from streaming platforms, but what stood out the most was that J. Cole subsequently issued an apology to Lamar.

Not one to let things go, however, Drake released “Push Ups” as his own response. Although “Push Ups” was widely successful, public opinion still remains that Drake lyrically hit the ball out of the park. However, a follow-up diss track was released on April 19th—Drake’s “Taylor Made Freestyle.” But unlike “Push Ups,” this was way more controversial. Why? Because Drake addresses Kendrick Lamar using AI vocals of Hip Hop legends Tupac Shakur and Snoop Dogg.

Snoop Dogg’s Reaction

Unlike Pac, who died in 1996, Snoop Dogg is very much alive to witness Drake’s shenanigans. Snoop seems to have been as shocked by the stunt as everyone else. In a hilarious Instagram post, he expressed his surprise: “They did what? When? How? Are you sure? [Sigh] Y’all have a good night. Why is everybody calling my phone, blowing me up? What the f— what happened? What’s going on? I’m going back to bed. Good night.” It’s safe to say that Snoop wasn’t all about that mess. 

Is “Taylor Made” A Calculated Move From Drake?

“Taylor Made” is certifiably a stellar track, as far as diss tracks go. For one, it is most likely a show-off to the public allegations that “Push Ups” was an AI track. Secondly, and perhaps most interestingly, is how Drake attempts to undermine Kendrick Lamar. Overall, this is a calculated strategy to belittle status as a heavyweight in the game. His use of AI seems to be a conscious effort to draw out a response from K-Dot.

Drake (as Tupac) addresses Kendrick Lamar on “Taylor Made,” saying: “Kendrick we need ya, the West Coast savior / Engraving your name in some hip-hop history… Call him a b*tch for me / Talk about him liking young girls as a gift for me.” While urging him to respond and engrave his name in “some Hip Hop history,” Drake also attempts to poke holes in perhaps all of Kendrick’s likely talking points for a diss track. These include the fact that he is Canadian and light-skinned. 

As most are aware, Kendrick Lamar has often been compared to Tupac Shakur. In fact, Kendrick himself has admitted to carrying on Tupac’s legacy. With these (and the following lines), Drake’s Tupac starts to question just how capable Kendrick is of taking on Tupac’s identity, if he can’t even stand the heat of facing him like Tupac did Biggie with “Hit ‘em Up,” one of the greatest diss tracks to ever exist. It’s important to note that Kendrick’s silence hasn’t sat well with fans. Many have clamored for him to issue a response to Drake, not just for “Taylor Made,” but also for “Push Ups.”

Drake Is Ready To Go To Rap War

Following his Tupac stint, Drake switches to Snoop Dogg’s vocals to speak to Lamar. He references Snoop “passing on the torch” to Kendrick Lamar at the House of Blues in 2011. Just like AI Tupac, AI Snoop also seems to also be disappointed in Kendrick’s silence. The elephant in the room is why Kendrick remains quiet after being challenged by someone like Drake. “World is watching this chess game, but oh you out of moves Dot / You know that the OG never f*cking doubted you / But right now it seem like you posted up without a clue / Or what the f*ck you ’bout to do.”

Eventually,  Drake finally switches to his own voice. However, he also makes it known that both “Taylor Made” and “Push Ups” were light work for him. He also claims he’s more than capable of going a few more rounds against Kendrick. Finally, he ascribes Kendrick’s silence to Taylor Swift’s new album The Tortured Poets Department, which is sure to top the charts.

But now we gotta wait a f*cking week ’cause Taylor Swift is your new top  (referencing Lamar’s former record label Top Dawg Entertainment) / And if you ’bout to drop, she gotta approve / This girl really ’bout to make you act like you not in a feud.

Is This A Misguided Effort?

Snoop Dogg and Tupac Shakur (Photo by Kevin Mazur Archive/WireImage)

For all its bravado and swagger, Drake’s “Taylor Made” is not without its pitfalls. By invoking Tupac’s name and legacy, Drake risks inviting comparisons that may ultimately work to Lamar’s advantage. There’s also the fact that AI use is still considered a major taboo in music. Drake lavishly utilizing it can easily be seen as a heavily misguided idea. After all, he is using it without the consent of the people in question. Particularly, one of the artists is dead and cannot speak for themselves. Therefore, it’s quite easy to see why many consider this as Drake crossing a line. Nonetheless, on the flip side, many could argue that there are no rules regarding diss tracks. Take Chris Brown, who recently referenced the passing of Takeoff in his diss track for Quavo.

Also, while it is obviously impressive to use up all the ammo that Kendrick Lamar could use on him, it still is pretty weird to describe himself as “liking younger women.” This attempted 8 Mile move, unfortunately, doesn’t hit quite as hard. While it’s commendable to poke fun at oneself, there’s obviously some things to consider. It’s pretty evident that Drake isn’t interested in that, though. 

Conclusion

Altogether, there is no one way to look at Drake’s “Taylor Made” diss track. It is both a divisive and creative moment in the ongoing saga of his rivalry with Kendrick Lamar. Another thing to note is that Drake seeks to be in a hurry to assert his dominance over Lamar. While this works in his favor, as he continues to earn public recognition, many have begun to sense it as a desperate move. Evidently, his campaign to reaffirm his status as king of “the big three” of Hip Hop is still very much alive. Regardless, whether or not he succeeds in this endeavor remains to be seen. One thing is certain: the feud between Drake and Kendrick Lamar shows no signs of abating, and Hip Hop is all the richer for it.

The post Drake “Taylor Made” Freestyle: Did He Cross A Line With AI Tupac & Snoop Dogg? appeared first on HotNewHipHop.

Drake Uses AI 2Pac To Diss Kendrick Lamar On “Taylor Made Freestyle”

Nobody saw this one coming. It was theorized by industry insiders that Drake would drop a second diss on Kendrick Lamar, much like he did with Meek Mill in 2015, but the hip-hop world has never heard a diss quite like “Taylor Made Freestyle.” Drake writes three verses, packed with insults and not-so-subtle jabs, but he only raps one of them in his regular voice. The other two are modified, using AI technology, to sound like Snoop Dogg and the late, great 2Pac! The same 2Pac that has been Lamar’s idol since childhood.

Drake unleashed “Taylor Made Freestyle” via Instagram on April 19. He doesn’t waste anytime using Lamar’s favorite rapper against him, as “2Pac” gets the first verse. The AI generated voice (with bars from Drake) sees “2Pac” consult Lamar on how to best defeat, well, Drake himself. “If you deal with this viciously, you see a little nervous about all the publicity,” the AI voice raps. “F**k this Canadian light skin guy, we need to know the west coast victory, man.” It’s a fascinating bit of reverse psychology, and it effectively allows Drake to sabotage the easy talking points that Lamar had at his disposal.

Read More: Every Time Kendrick Lamar Took Shots At Drake

Drake Used AI To Turn K. Dot’s Heroes Against Him

The second verse goes to the AI generated voice of Snoop Dogg. The voice continues the disappointed tone set by AI 2Pac by urging Lamar to put together a response track ASAP. “Still you gotta show this f**king owl who’s boss on the west, now’s a time to really make a power move,” he raps. “‘Cause right now it’s looking like you writing out the gameplan with how to lose.” Another withering line from the Doggfather’s doppleganger is: “World is watching this chess game, but oh, you out of moves.”

After using Kendrick Lamar’s own heroes against him, Drake raps the third verse in his own voice. He relentlessly mocks the Compton rapper for taking so long to respond after starting the feud in the first place. “Since your tone changed a little, you not as enthused,” Drake asserts. “How are you not in the booth? It feel like you kinda removed.” The 6 God gets even more specific towards the end of the song, claiming that K. Dot needs “another week” to get himself together.

Kendrick Lamar has been saddled with AI disses in recent weeks, with fans being unsure of what’s real and what isn’t. Drake using AI tech to then diss him further is a chess move that Lamar will not be able to ignore.

Read More: Drake Posts Photo Of Kendrick Lamar’s Manager With OVO Merch

The post Drake Uses AI 2Pac To Diss Kendrick Lamar On “Taylor Made Freestyle” appeared first on HotNewHipHop.

Jermaine Dupri Claims AI Music Generator Is “Disrespectful” To Artists

Jermaine Dupri knows talent when he hears it. The producer has worked with some of the most popular artists of the last few decades, including Mariah Carey and Usher. He’s also a member of the Songwriters Hall of Fame, which is a testament to his musical versatility. It’s for these reasons and more that Dupri is upset with the current state of the industry. During a recent interview with AllHipHop, the producer said that he was “disgusted” by the advent of the AI music generator Udio. In his estimation, the generator should be boycotted by real artists.

Udio is an AI music generator that allows users to create a song within 40 seconds. It does not require knowledge of musical scales or instruments. Dupri believes the low barrier for entry is an insult to those who had dedicated time to mastering their craft. “N***as that’s been playing music they whole life that take piano lessons, keyboard lessons, whatever, guitar lessons,” he said. “We’re allowing a company of people that are probably not musicians to say, ‘We making an app so everybody and anybody can make music and be a music virtuoso’.” Furthermore, the producer points out that Udio could hurt the financial earnings of artists.

Read More: Jermaine Dupri Net Worth 2024: Updated Wealth Of The Producer

Jermaine Dupri Thinks Udio Will Hurt Music

Jermaine Dupri criticized former So So Def affiliate Chris Lyons for his involvement with Udio, and likened the music generator to the lack of music regulation on TikTok. “I ain’t understood this for a long time,” he admitted. “It’s starting to be more apparent now. It’s the same reason that [Universal Music Group CEO] Lucian [Grainge] pulled the plug on TikTok. That’s what I’m saying. I don’t understand why we keep allowing this s**t to happen.” The resentment on Dupri’s end largely stems from the fact that those pushing Udio are not part of the music business.

“Why do we keep having or keep allowing people from different backgrounds, people from different walks of life, come in our business?”, he asked the AllHipHop interviewer. “You don’t do this to the NBA. They don’t do this to football. They don’t do this to no business because the business don’t allow this.” Dupri’s comments about AI could not have come at a better time. Fake AI diss tracks have run rampant in the last few weeks, especially in relation to the ongoing Drake and Kendrick Lamar feud. Dupri may have a point.

Read More: Jermaine Dupri Chimes In On “The Real Big 3” Amid Kendrick Lamar, Drake, & J. Cole Feud

[Via]

The post Jermaine Dupri Claims AI Music Generator Is “Disrespectful” To Artists appeared first on HotNewHipHop.

TikTok Producer Reveals How He Made Kendrick Lamar’s AI Diss

The truth is out. The Kendrick Lamar diss that’s been floating around the internet the last few days has been confirmed to be AI generated. There was widespread confusion as to who leaked Lamar’s alleged response to Drake and J Cole, but it turns out the “diss” track was made by a producer named Syd The Rapper. Syd revealed the truth via TikTok on April 16, and admitted he was surprised the AI track fooled so many listeners.

Syd proved the claim that he created the AI diss by showing TikTok users the music file on his computer. The artist explained that he wanted to make the track to see how convincing the AI technology could be. It turned out to be far more convincing than he expected. “I ain’t gonna lie, I psyched myself,” Syd stated. “I thought it was gonna sound fake, I thought people was gonna be able to tell it was fake. People think it’s actually real.” Syd went on to give the AI diss an official title, “One Shot,” before assuring fans that Kendrick Lamar had nothing to do with its creation.

Read More: Which Rappers Have Apologized To Kendrick Lamar?

Kendrick’s “Diss” Was Made Without His Involvement

Syd The Artist voiced his support for Lamar, and asserted that the real diss record will be much better than what he created. “I just wanna come out for the record and say that it’s AI,” he added. “That’s not Kendrick’s response. I know Kendrick’s gonna come harder than that. I just couldn’t get too disrespectful cuse I ain’t in that beef.” The artist closed out his confession on a lighter note by noting that Drake heard the AI diss. “I seen Drake heard it and commended, and he laughed at it,” Syd said, while also laughing.

Syd’s reveal shuts down the theories that some industry insiders had about Lamar’s track being “bad.” Daylyt, a rapper who appeared on J Cole’s Might Delete Later, tweeted that he knew the leak was AI. He even clapped back at Mal of New Rory And Mal Podcast for suggesting it was real. “Like I said 100000% ai,” Daylyt wrote. “@thisisrory tell mal I said put his account on mut [sic] for a few days lol.”

The good news is that Lamar’s real response has yet to see the light of day. The bad news is that AI is getting so advanced that fans can no longer tell what’s real and what’s not.

Read More: Kendrick Lamar Accused Of Using Ghostwriter Amid Drake Beef, Reference Track Surfaces

The post TikTok Producer Reveals How He Made Kendrick Lamar’s AI Diss appeared first on HotNewHipHop.

Travis Scott & Kid Cudi Victims Of AI As “WEBSTER II” Collab Tape Creates Mass Confusion

It has been nearly four years since Travis Scott and Kid Cudi formed their duo THE SCOTTS. To celebrate them coming together, the dropped an inaugural self-titled single that did massive numbers. However, since then they have not put out any new material under that moniker. There were some rumblings from Cudi that a SCOTTS record would be a possibility in 2023 after shutting that down the year prior. But fans are still being left in the dark on that to this day. That is until today when Travis Scott and his mentor surprised everyone with an album called WEBSTER II (W E B S T E R I I).

Or did they? Fans have been blowing up X about the record, questioning if its real. Right of the bat, you can tell something fishy is going on here. For example, Uproxx confirmed that neither Scott nor Cudi did anything to promote it on social media. Also working against WEBSTER II is the fact that is credited to THE SCOTTS and JACKBOYS. Of course, the latter is Travis’ collective of Cactus Jack signees Don Toliver Sheck Wes, etc. that dropped their self-titled record in 2019. Furthermore, it is only up on Apple Music.

Read More: Diddy Home Raid: Music Mogul & Brendan Paul Seen Speaking To Federal Agents At The Airport

X Users React To WEBSTER II By Travis Scott & Kid Cudi

The last bit of confirmation that this unfortunately not real, comes from X users giving the actual origins of this tape. In the quoted reply above, he says that this an AI album from Scott called 4th Dimension, which he claims is “hacked.” Even though this turned out to be a hoax, fans who listened to it were digging it. At the time of writing, the project is still available on the platform. But we suspect it will be taken down by the end of the day. Scott and Cudi fans, just keep wishing for a SCOTTS album.

What are your thoughts on this AI Travis Scott and Kid Cudi album, WEBSTER II, dropping on Apple Music? Were you able to catch that it was not a real release? Did any tracks wind up standing out to you? Do you think we are ever going to get a SCOTTS album? We would like to hear what you have to say, so be sure to leave your takes in the comments section. Additionally, always keep it locked in with HNHH for all of the latest news surrounding Travis Scott and Kid Cudi. Finally, stay with us for everything else going on around the world of music.

Read More: Diddy Home Raid: Lawyer Calls Investigation “A Gross Misuse Of Military-Level Force”

[Via]

The post Travis Scott & Kid Cudi Victims Of AI As “WEBSTER II” Collab Tape Creates Mass Confusion appeared first on HotNewHipHop.

DMX AI Tracks Earn Fan Backlash

Fans have protested after news broke alleging that DMX’s record label, Cleopatra Records, released a number of songs using AI to recreate the late rapper’s vocals. “Silent Night”, “Halloween From Miami To LA”, and “Long Live X” were all released in September and October. All three tracks appear to include heavily edited or AI-enhanced vocals of the rapper who died in 2021. “DMX’s label is releasing new DMX songs made with AI on Spotify… bro this is so disrespectful, especially when the artist isnt even alive anymore. Its Not even good AI. you can tell its not DMX,” one fan wrote on X, formerly Twitter.

Cleopatra Records had previously released Exodus as a posthumous album a month after DMX’s death. Furthermore, Swizz Beatz had alluded to the possibility of a second posthumous release, given the sheer amount of unreleased content DMX left behind. However, that second release has yet to come and now the record label is scrambling to retain fans after their adventure in AI. However, at this time, Cleopatra Records has not yet issued a statement about the releases and whether they do in fact use AI.

Read More: DMX’s Son Plays “X Gon’ Give It To Ya” On Piano For Rapper’s Birthday: Watch

AI Music Still Proving Controversial

It’s been a big year for AI music, with the technology recently being used to release the “last-ever new Beatles song”. However, it’s use remains heavily debated and highly controversial. Mike Tyson called an AI 2Pac and Biggie track “f-cked up”. Meanwhile, Khalid told TMZ earlier this year that he saw the potential benefits of AI but was afraid of what it meant for human performers.

However, the technology does have its advocates. Speaking with TMZ, JoJo called AI music technology “interesting” and argued that it could be used for “harmonies and backgrounds”. Additionally, she said that the use of the technology was inevitable and the music industry shouldn’t wait too long to embrace it. As mentioned, the debate is not going to end anytime soon.

Read More: Styles P Recalls DMX Dissing Ja Rule On “We Don’t Give A F*ck”

[via]

The post DMX AI Tracks Earn Fan Backlash appeared first on HotNewHipHop.

Young Guru Gets Real About AI Biggie Music

Young Guru is someone who has been very much against the rise of AI music. Overall, he is not the only person to be against it. AI music can be quite dangerous to art forms as a whole. Although some fans find it fascinating, others see it as a disgusting new technology. Now, we have non-consensual collaborations between artists who would never work together. Moreover, artists who have passed away are now being placed into new songs they would have never done.

However, producers like Timbaland are trying to monetize AI music and commercialize it for the future. Young Guru even warned Timbaland about this, saying “@timbaland I love you my brother. You know I do. But this ain’t it!!! This is dangerous and at a basic level it’s corny!! I will be on the side of the Luddites.” Subsequently, Guru has since spoken with Okayplayer on his thoughts about AI. In the interview, he spoke about Biggie specifically and how these songs can tarnish his legacy.

Read More: Young Guru Calls Out People Writing Hip Hop Books With “Wrong” History

Young Guru Speaks

Artist Young Guru speaks onstage at The 2020 NAMM Show on January 17, 2020 in Anaheim, California. (Photo by Jerod Harris/Getty Images for NAMM)

“When you take Big’s voice and you have him saying things that he would have never said, or it’s your interpretation or some other writer’s interpretation of what you think Big would have said, this kind of violates him and his legacy,” Young Guru explained. “How do you think his daughter felt? How do you think CJ felt hearing their dad’s voice? Do you think Faith feels? How do you think Big’s mom feels? They’re not getting paid from any of these things that are being put out.”

Overall, it is very easy to see how someone could feel this way. Quite frankly, AI music is something that takes the heart and soul out of art. However, with art being treated as a commodity, it’s not surprising this ended up happening. Let us know what you think of Young Guru’s comments, down below. Additionally, stay tuned to HNHH for more news from the music world.

Read More: Rappers Who Cheated Death: Timbaland, Kanye & More

[Via]

The post Young Guru Gets Real About AI Biggie Music appeared first on HotNewHipHop.

Meek Mill Shares A.I. Song By His Dead Father: “WTF”

Meek Mill shared an A.I. song on Twitter, Tuesday, that mimicked his late father for a rap song. The track is titled, “Back From The Grave,” and is credited to Big Robbie, a reference to Meek’s father, Robert Parker. Parker was shot and killed when Meek was just a child.

“Ai wrote a rap about my dad and this what he said WTF,” Meek captioned the song on Twitter. “Delete dis big dawg like seriously,” one fan replied. Another advised, “That’s high key scary. Make sure they can’t keep the rights to his likeness now.” Others labeled the track “weird” and creepy.”

Read More: Is AI A Threat To Hip-Hop?

Meek Mill On Stage In D.C.

WASHINGTON, DC – MARCH 21: Meek Mill performs in concert at The Anthem on March 21, 2019 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Brian Stukes/Getty Images)

The song features the lyrics, “I died in a shootout, just tryin’ to feed my fam / But death couldn’t stop me, I’m back in the lab / My son Meek Mill, he’s the light of my life / Gotta watch over him, I’m back from the afterlife / I’m Big Robbie and I’m back with a plan / I’m comin’ back to life to see my fam / My soul’s come alive, I’m gonna make it right / Back from the grave, I’m gonna fight the fight.”

Meek previously addressed the death of his father on the song, “Traumatized,” from his 2012 album, Dreams and Nightmares. With the song, Meek threatens Parker’s murderer: “You ripped my family apart and made my momma cry / So when I see you n***a it’s gon’ be a homicide.”

Meek Mill Uses A.I. Technology

The future of A.I. technology and its impact on the music industry is unclear. During Spotify’s quarterly financial call in April, CEO Daniel Ek described it as both “really cool and scary.” He explained: “These are very, very complex issues that don’t have a single straight answer…But we’re in constant discussion with our partners and creators and artists and want to strike a balance between allowing innovation and, of course, protecting artists.”

Read More: Jay-Z A.I. Verse Scares Hip-Hop World

[Via]

Spotify Wipes Thousands Of AI Songs From Its Platform

Spotify has reportedly taken down tens of thousands of tracks from the AI company, Boomy. Universal Music previously reported the company for suspicious streaming activity to Spotify. The platform pays out to artists on the basis of streaming numbers and thus takes artificially boosted numbers quite seriously.

“Artificial streaming is a longstanding, industry-wide issue that Spotify is working to stamp out across our service,” Spotify said in a statement to Insider. “When we identify or are alerted to potential cases of stream manipulation, we mitigate their impact by taking action that may include the removal of streaming numbers and the withholding of royalties. This allows us to protect royalty payouts for honest, hardworking artists.”

Read More: Is AI A Threat To Hip-Hop?

Spotify Cracks Down On A.I. Music

PARIS, FRANCE – JANUARY 06: In this photo illustration, the logo of the Swedish music streaming service Spotify is displayed on the screen of an iPhone on January 06, 2017 in Paris, France. Spotify announced, via a tweet published Thursday, that it now has 70 million paid subscribers. As a comparison, in September, Apple Music claimed 30 million subscribers and Deezer had fewer than 10 million subscribers. (Photo by Chesnot/Getty Images)

The recent takedown encompasses 7% of Boomy’s total tracks. A.I. technology and its impact on the music industry has been a prominent talking point in recent weeks. Songs recreating vocals from Drake, The Weeknd, JAY-Z, and many more artists have all gone viral on social media. Many artists have condemned the use of their vocal likeness in the songs, while others, such as Grimes, have embraced it.

During Spotify’s quarterly financial call in April, CEO Daniel Ek described A.I. technology as both “really cool and scary.” He explained: “These are very, very complex issues that don’t have a single straight answer…But we’re in constant discussion with our partners and creators and artists and want to strike a balance between allowing innovation and, of course, protecting artists.” He added: I think the whole industry is trying to figure that out and trying to figure out [AI] training…I would definitely put that on the risk account because there’s a lot of uncertainty, I think, for the entire ecosystem.”

Read More: Jay-Z A.I. Verse Scares Hip-Hop World

[Via]

Grimes Gives AI Generators Permission To Use Her Voice

Grimes has always been a little bit all over the place. In the beginning of her career, she positioned herself as an indie electronic darling. As time went on, however, fans discovered that Grimes was far from the “girl of the people” they thought she was. They found out that her parents were actually quite wealthy, at least compared to the general population. Her mother was a famed prosecutor, and her father worked in biotech. Far from the humble background that fans originally assumed she came from. Then, several years ago, Grimes was revealed to be dating Elon Musk. At the time, it was quite a surprising move. However, fans soon discovered that the decision was very much in line with who Grimes is as a person.

Grimes, whose real name is Claire Elise Boucher, is a Canadian singer, songwriter, and visual artist. She first gained attention in the music industry with her self-released album Geidi Primes in 2010. Grimes’ music is often described as experimental, blending various genres such as pop, electronic, and art-pop. She has released several critically acclaimed albums, including Visions and Art Angels. Grimes is also known for her distinctive fashion and has been recognized for her unique artistic vision, both in her music and visual art. She has collaborated with many other artists over the years. In addition, she was married to Elon Musk, with whom she has two children.

Grimes took to Twitter to speak about the AI collab between Drake and The Weeknd that hit streaming services last week. The song went viral, but was taken down from streaming soon after. Many in the industry are appalled at the ramifications that something like this could have. Grimes, however, sees it as both a good thing and an opportunity to make some money. “I’ll split 50% royalties on any successful AI generated song that uses my voice,” Grimes said in a tweet. “Same deal as I would with any artist i collab with. Feel free to use my voice without penalty. I have no label and no legal bindings.”

That was already bad enough, but Grimes took it one step further. In addition to giving AI generators the go-ahead to use her voice, she advocated for open-sourcing all art and killing copyright. “I think it’s cool to be fused w a machine,” she said in the second tweet. “And I like the idea of open sourcing all art and killing copyright.” Hilariously, the follow-up tweet is in direct opposition to her offer to split royalties. If there is no copyright and everything is open-source, that would mean that Grimes would not receive royalties. It seems, however, that this was lost on her and her followers as they excitedly chimed in with messages of support and agreement. What do you think of Grimes’ statements? Let us know in the comments.