Nike and HUF, the renowned skating and streetwear brand, are teaming up for an exciting new release. The Nike Air Max 1 “Brilliant Orange” collaboration is set to turn heads. This fresh colorway features a sophisticated grey base that highlights the vibrant orange accents. The upper of the sneaker is constructed with premium grey materials, offering a sleek and versatile look. The “Brilliant Orange” details pop against this neutral backdrop, creating a striking contrast. Orange accents can be found on the Nike Swoosh, eyelets, and Air Max branding, adding a bold touch to the classic silhouette.
The midsole combines the signature Air Max cushioning with the orange detailing, ensuring both comfort and style. The outsole maintains the grey and orange theme, providing excellent traction and completing the cohesive design. This collaboration between Nike and HUF brings a modern twist to the iconic Air Max 1. It’s a perfect blend of streetwear aesthetics and athletic functionality. Sneaker enthusiasts and HUF fans alike are eagerly anticipating this release. The Nike Air Max 1 “Brilliant Orange” is more than just a shoe; it’s a statement piece. Stay tuned for its release and don’t miss the chance to add this vibrant pair to your collection.
The sneaker features a grey and orange rubber sole and a clean light grey midsole. A grey mesh constructs the base of the uppers, with more grey overlays in two shades. Also, a vibrant orange Nike Swoosh adorns the sides. Black and orange laces and Nike branding on the tongue and the heels complete the design.
Sneaker Bar Detroit reports that the Nike Air Max 1 x HUF “Brilliant Orange” will be released sometime this summer. Also, the retail price of the sneakers will be $160 when they drop. Further, make sure to let us know what you think about these kicks in the comments below. Additionally, stay tuned to HNHH for the most recent updates and news from the sneaker community. We’ll make sure to offer you the newest products from the most notable brands.
YNW Melly has been behind bars since 2019 when he was arrested and accused of murdering two of his associates, YNW Juvy and YNW Sakchaser. The rapper was charged with two counts of first-degree murder, and first went on trial last summer. It was ruled a mistrial after the jury failed to come to a unanimous decision. If convicted, he faces life in prison or the death penalty.
Now, he continues to await his retrial, which was initially slated for October of last year. It’s since seen multiple delays. It remains unclear exactly when he’ll be retried, but in the meantime, his attorneys have been hard at work. Earlier this week, for example, his team filed a motion to exclude his co-defendant YNW Bortlen’s phone conversations with his girlfriend Juneviah Molina from the upcoming retrial.
According to them, the conversations between Bortlen and Molina include nothing but “small talk.” His attorneys claim they’re “irrelevant, inadmissible hearsay, and lack an evidentiary basis to be used against” Melly. Their motion also argues that YouTube videos featuring 1090 Jake should be prohibited. Since December of last year, prosecutors have been fighting to use Melly’s phone records, emails, and social media posts as evidence in the upcoming retrial. They’re also looking to use a 20-minute documentary about his rise to fame. Allegedly, it shows him holding a weapon at various times and briefly mentions the deaths of Juvy and Sakchaser.
Last month, Melly was moved to a new facility for the first time since his 2019 arrest, and now resides at the Paul Rein Detention Facility in Pompano Beach, FL. He’ll remain there until the retrial. What do you think of YNW Melly’s team filing a motion to exclude his phone calls with YNW Bortlen from his upcoming double murder retrial? Share your thoughts in the comments section down below, and keep an eye on HNHH for more updates.
Though the verdict in Tory Lanez trial for allegedly shooting Megan Thee Stallion in the foot was handed down last year, the trial is far from over. Earlier this year Tory’s lawyers filed a motion to get him an entire new trial. They claimed that testimony given by witnesses in the case was prejudicial and that warranted a new trial. Unfortunately for the rapper and singer, the judge shut that motion down. But that doesn’t mean he’s going to just accept his verdict.
Lanez’ lawyers followed it up with an appeal of the original ruling. For anybody hoping that the appeal process might move quickly, that doesn’t appear to be the case. Reporter Meghann Cuniff revealed that the appeal, which was first filed a few months ago, was approaching its deadline. Now the prosecutors have requested another extension for their reply. Cuniff explains that it’s almost certain to be granted, further extending the ultimate conclusion of the trial to a later date. Check out all of the details she shared on recent developments of the case below.
Tory Lanez is appealing his convictions and 10-year sentence for shooting Megan Thee Stallion, and his brief was filed 3 months ago.
But don’t expect anything to happen soon. Prosecutors today requested another deadline extension for their reply, and it’s certain to be granted. pic.twitter.com/v4Se4G3TN4
Though Lanez has been behind bars all year he hasn’t completely disappeared from public discourse. In fact, he even got to chime in on the details of the biggest story in rap music this year, Drake and Kendrick Lamar’s beef. He was one of the few to side with Drake in the beef, which isn’t much of a surprise given that the “Rich Baby Daddy” rapper has been an advocate for Tory’s release for a while now. At the time of Lanez’ comments Joe Budden, who relayed his information on the beef, also claimed that Lanez hadn’t necessarily heard all of the songs released by both rappers. He’s yet to give an updated take now that the entire beef has passed by.
What do you think of Tory Lanez’ continued fight to overturn his guilty conviction once again being delayed? Do you think he has any chance at freeing himself through an appeal? Let us know in the comment section below.
Elliott Wilson has revealed that Toronto ‘OGs’ threatened him for his stance on the Drake and Kendrick Lamar beef that dominated the Hip Hop circuit for weeks.
On the Emmy-winning program ‘Inside the NBA,’ the dynamic quartet of Shaquille O’Neal, Charles Barkley, Kenny Smith, and Ernie Johnson, along with guest Draymond Green, were in their element while covering Game 1 of the Western Conference Finals series between the Dallas Mavericks and Minnesota Timberwolves. Amidst their usual basketball discussion, a hilarious moment unfolded. Last week, when the Timberwolves eliminated the Nuggets, Anthony Edwards, in a moment of jest, told Charles Barkley, who claimed he hadn’t been to Minnesota in 20 years, ‘Bring your a**.’ This response instantly went viral. The ‘Inside the NBA’ crew, true to their nature, had a field day with the incident during their recent broadcast, with Shaq even referencing Metro Boomin’s infamous Drake diss.
Since the TNT program would be in town to cover the aforementioned games, Charles only wanted to ask Edwards for a list of places. His question gave us Anthony Edwards’s “Bring you a**” quote as well as confirmation he will send the Chuckster Minnesota’s best restaurants, the All-Star guard promised. During last night’s broadcast, they displayed photoshopped pictures of Barkel and the crew referencing Edwards’s viral quote. It prompted Shaq to wildly say, “I didn’t know you had all that a** back there, Chuck! Let me see Chuck’s feature again. MOM. BBL Chuck! BBL Chucky!”
Shaq’s jab against Barkley is a clear nod to Metro Boomin’s popular Drake diss record, “BBL Drizzy.” The song made an allusion to the purported cosmetic procedure that Drake was accused of having undergone. Shaq made a clever move by using the freshly released diss track to taunt Barkley. Everybody on the set was laughing, even Sir Charles.
The Inside The NBA crew is still enjoying themselves despite the tough times for the program. The impending end of the show is becoming more and more a reality as the NBA has decided to look elsewhere for its NBA rights. How can you look at last night’s “BBL Chucky” moment and not want the show to continue? It’s so good people are willing to just ignore that Draymond Green is there. Overall, it was one of many hilarious moments the show has had over the years.
Bradley Whitford, an accomplished actor known for his versatile roles in television and film, has made a significant mark in Hollywood with his impressive talent and dedication. As of 2024, his net worth is estimated to be around $11 million, according to IAmGoldPanda. Whitford’s career spans several decades, showcasing his ability to navigate a variety of genres and characters, from political dramas to comedic roles, making him a respected figure in the entertainment industry.
Born on October 10, 1959, in Madison, Wisconsin, Bradley Whitford developed an interest in acting during his college years at Wesleyan University. His early forays into theater laid the groundwork for a career that would see him become one of his generation’s most recognizable and talented actors. Whitford’s journey to stardom reflects his dedication to his craft and his ability to bring depth and authenticity to every role he undertakes.
Breakthrough With The West Wing
NEW YORK – MAY 17: Colin Hanks, Diana Maria Riva, Jenny Wade and Bradley Whitford attend the 2010 FOX. UpFront after party at Wollman Rink, Central Park on May 17, 2010, also in New York City. (Photo by George Napolitano/FilmMagic)
Bradley Whitford’s career-defining role came with his portrayal of Josh Lyman in the critically acclaimed television series The West Wing. Created by Aaron Sorkin, the show debuted in 1999 and quickly became a cultural phenomenon. It was also praised for its intelligent writing and compelling characters. Whitford’s performance as the Deputy Chief of Staff earned him widespread acclaim and a Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Supporting Actor in a Drama Series in 2001.
The West Wing not only solidified Whitford’s place in television history but also significantly contributed to his net worth. The series’ success and enduring popularity through syndication and streaming services continue to generate income for its cast, including Whitford. His role on the show showcased his ability to easily handle complex, politically charged dialogue. This made Josh Lyman one of the most memorable characters on television.
Versatility In Film & Television
BEVERLY HILLS, CA – FEBRUARY 03: (L-R) Actors Marcus Henderson and Betty Gabriel, director. Jordan Peele, recipient of the Nomination Medallion for Outstanding Directorial Achievement in. Feature Film for ‘Get Out’, and actors Bradley Whitford and Catherine Keener pose in the press room during the. 70th Annual Directors Guild Of America Awards at The Beverly Hilton Hotel on February 3, 2018, also in Beverly Hills, California. (Photo by Frederick M. Brown/Getty Images)
Following his success on The West Wing, Bradley Whitford demonstrated his versatility by taking on a variety of roles in both film and television. He starred in the horror-comedy The Cabin in the Woods (2012), directed by Drew Goddard, where his performance added a layer of dark humor to the film’s unique narrative. Whitford also appeared in Jordan Peele’s critically acclaimed horror film Get Out (2017). His portrayal of the unsettling Dean Armitage also earned him further praise and recognition.
Whitford’s television career flourished with roles in popular series such as Transparent, where he played the transgender character Marcy, earning him a Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Guest Actor in a Comedy Series. His role in The Handmaid’s Tale as Commander Joseph Lawrence showcased his ability to delve into complex and morally ambiguous characters, further cementing his reputation as a versatile and talented actor.
Personal Life & Advocacy
LOS ANGELES, CA – OCTOBER 23: Robert Carradine, Ever Carradine and Bradley Whitford are seen on the. SAG-AFTRA picket line at Warner Brothers Studios on October 23, 2023, also in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by JOCE/Bauer-Griffin/GC Images)
Further, Bradley Whitford is known for his active involvement in social and political causes. He is a vocal advocate for progressive policies and has used his platform to support various charitable organizations and initiatives. Whitford’s commitment to activism is reflected in his public speaking engagements and participation in political campaigns. He champions issues such as climate change, healthcare, and human rights.
Whitford’s personal life has also been a subject of interest. He married actress Jane Kaczmarek from 1992 until their divorce in 2010, and the couple has three children together. In 2019, he married actress Amy Landecker, further solidifying his connections within the entertainment community. Whitford’s ability to balance his professional and personal life and his commitment to advocacy add depth to his public persona and endear him to fans and colleagues alike.
In the world of hip-hop, rivalries and beefs are often as intense as they are intriguing. The ongoing feud between Kendrick Lamar and Drake has been no exception, with both artists trading bars and references that delve deep into the legacies of two music icons: Michael Jackson and Prince. This beef has become an exploration of artistic merit, commercial success, and celebrity, all through the lens of these two legendary figures. At the crux of this battle lies a fundamental divide: Prince (Kendrick Lamar) versus Michael Jackson (Drake). This topic has been a consistent point of contention, brought up repeatedly by both artists throughout their careers. In making comparisons to these icons, the musicians are asserting their respective identities and claiming a place in music history.
On tracks like “You Only Live Twice” and “Toosie Slide,” Drake boldly proclaims himself as the embodiment of Jackson. He boasts about his ability to “dance like Michael Jackson” and proclaims that he is “MJ in every way.” These declarations are a clear nod to the King of Pop’s unparalleled popularity and showmanship. Lamar, on the other hand, has consistently aligned himself with Prince. On songs like “Mask Off (Remix),” “Real 92.3 Freestyle,” and “Somebody,” he claims that Prince “lives through” him, fluctuating his vocals like the Purple One and embracing the artistic fearlessness that defined Prince’s legacy. The dichotomy between Kendrick Lamar and Drake has ignited a fascinating conversation about the true meaning of greatness in music. Lamar appears to revere artistic genius and boundary-pushing creativity, while Drake seems drawn to Jackson’s unprecedented fame and global reach.
“First Person Shooter”
On “First Person Shooter,” Drake makes grandiose claims about his successful career, shouting out the Beatles and Michael Jackson. Notably, he references being just one song away from tying Jackson’s record for the most number-one US Billboard Hot 100 singles by a solo male artist. In the music video, he dons a sequined glove and performs the “Beat It” dance steps, symbolically claiming Jackson’s crown.
“Like That”
On the track “Like That,” Kendrick Lamar takes a direct shot at Drake’s affinity for Michael Jackson, declaring, “Prince outlived Mike Jack.” This line is a powerful statement that references how Prince died roughly seven years after Michael Jackson. However, Kendrick also suggests that Prince’s artistic legacy transcends even the monumental achievements of the late Michael Jackson, though Lamar isn’t insulting the latter. Rather, he’s asserting that true artistry should be valued above commercial dominance.
Drake, however, refuses to back down. On “Push Ups,” he responds with the line, “What’s a prince to king? He a son, n—-.” This retort flips the dynamic, positioning Drake as the “king” and Kendrick Lamar as the “prince,” a mere heir to his throne. Moreover, Michael Jackson’s eldest son’s name is Prince. It’s a clever play on words that speaks to Drake’s undeniable success, albeit without directly addressing Lamar’s artistic critique.
“Euphoria”
As the battle continues, the references become more layered and complex. On “Euphoria,” Lamar opens with a reversed audio sample from the movie The Wiz starring Michael Jackson. It features Richard Pryor’s character saying, “Everything you say about me is true, I’m a phony.” This bold move sets the stage for Lamar’s response, potentially hinting at allegations against Drake’s character. Kendrick Lamar then follows with the line, “Got a Benjamin and a Jackson all in my house like I’m Joe, okay.“
This multilayered reference not only flips Drake’s “prince to king” line, positioning Kendrick Lamar as Drake’s “father” figure, but also pays homage to Michael Jackson’s father, Joe Jackson, and the iconic singer’s childhood pet rat named Ben (a nod to Michael’s second album). It’s a clever play on words that intertwines financial success (Benjamin Franklin and Andrew Jackson on U.S. currency) with familial dynamics and subtle allusions to Michael Jackson’s personal life. It’s also a subtle yet potent way for Lamar to reclaim the “son” moniker, positioning himself as the true heir to the throne.
“It’s time that you look around on who’s around you/Before you figure that you’re not alone, ask what Mike would do,” Kendrick raps as the final bars on “6:16 In L.A.” After incessantly calling out Drake for being surrounded by snakes within his team on “6:16 In LA,” Kendrick Lamar ominously warns Drake of a fate similar to Michael Jackson’s. The line references Jackson’s hit “You Are Not Alone,” while the phrase “ask what Mike would do” mirrors sayings like “What Would Jesus Do?” — hinting that Drake may be worshipping the wrong idols. Lamar seems to allude to the circumstances around Jackson’s 2009 death, which was ruled a homicide due to a lethal mix of drugs administered by his personal doctor Conrad Murray, who was later convicted of involuntary manslaughter. The lyrics suggest Drake should be wary of those close to him.
Moreover, the reference to “You Are Not Alone” – written by R. Kelly, who has faced allegations of sexual misconduct with minors – could be seen as Kendrick doubling down on implications about Drake’s rumored interests. Lamar may be implying Drake needs self-reflection, akin to Jackson’s “Man In The Mirror,” after previously calling him a “master manipulator” on “euphoria.” The haunting lyric serves as a multi-layered warning – urging Drake to re-evaluate his circle, his idols, and ultimately himself, before suffering a tragic downfall like icons before him.
“Family Matters”
On “Family Matters,” Drake delivers some of his most pointed jabs, rapping, “Your darkest secrets are comin’ to light/ It’s all on your face like what happened to Mike/ Oh shit, it’s all makin’ sense, maybe I’m Prince and you actually Mike/Michael was prayin’ his features would change so people believe that he’s actually white/ Top would make you do features for change, get on pop records and rap for the whites/ And wait, you say your brother Jermaine, but you wanted him to stay out of the light.“
Drake starts by implying Lamar has dark secrets being exposed, comparing it to Jackson’s vitiligo. Vitiligo is an autoimmune disorder that caused the pop icon’s skin to lighten. He’s responding to Lamar’s “Prince outlived Mike Jack” line, flipping the script to declare himself as the “Prince” who will outshine and outlast Lamar, the “Michael.” The lyrics then take aim at Lamar’s musical direction. Drake insinuates that just as Jackson used makeup and skin-bleaching to appear whiter, Lamar does pop features with acts like Maroon 5 and Taylor Swift to pander to white audiences on “orders” from his former label boss Anthony Tiffith.
It’s a multifaceted critique – questioning Lamar’s authenticity and Blackness while mocking his need to chase mainstream, white popularity. The “Jermaine” line also randomly ropes in J. Cole, Lamar’s brother-like collaborator, with allusions to Jackson’s brother Jermaine, implying Lamar doesn’t want him in the spotlight. With these heated bars, Drake wields Jackson’s complicated heritage as a weapon. He uses racially-charged insinuations to strip Lamar of his street cred and artistic integrity.
Enduring Legacies and Artistic Ideal
Beyond the lyrical exchanges, this beef highlights the enduring influence of Michael Jackson and Prince on contemporary music. Their contributions continue to shape the discourse around what it means to be a true artist. Both figures have served as powerful archetypes for opposing ideals. Ultimately, Kendrick Lamar and Drake’s beef has transcended mere lyrical jabs. It has evolved into an exploration of creative identity, legacy, and fame’s complexities. Michael Jackson and Prince have inspired both of these rappers to speak to the very core of what it means to be a true musician in today’s world.
Earlier this week, Kelly Rowland was thrust into headlines when cameras captured an interesting interaction between her and security personnel on the red carpet at Cannes. In the clip multiple ushers from the event seem to rush her away from the spot she was posing for photos and up some stairs along the carpet. That sparked an argument between Rowland and some of the ushers prompting even more to come over to her. They even appear to try and block her from speaking to someone she recognizes and force her along the carpet.
The video sparked outrage online as it looked like Rowland was being mistreated by the security at the film festival. In a new interview she spoke on the incident and didn’t hold much back. “The woman knows what happened. I know what happened. And, I have a boundary. I stand by those boundaries. And that is it. There were other women that attended that carpet who did not quite look like me and they didn’t get scolded, or pushed off, or told to get off. And I stood my ground, and she felt like she had to stand hers. But, I stood my ground. And that was it,” she said in an interview with AP. Check out the full clip of what she had to say below.
In the comments of the post many are coming to Rowland’s support. “I can tell it hurts her to be treated that way. People don’t talk about how it’s painful to HAVE to stand your ground” one of the top comments reads. Others are bringing up a particular incident that she went viral for earlier this year. “Isn’t she the one who stormed out of the today show because her dressing room was too small?” one refutation reads.
What do you think of Kelly Rowland’s response to the viral videos of the way security at Cannes handled her? Do you agree that if it were someone else other than her they would have treated the situation differently? Let us know in the comment section below.
