subpoena

Michael Jackson’s Company Wants Accusers Blocked From Seeing Nudes

by

Two men who accuse Michael Jackson of molesting them as children, Wade Robson and James Safechuck, have requested to access his criminal record. According to his company, however, access should not be granted. MJ’s company argues that there is incredibly private information contained in the file. Moreover, they claim it contains photos of MJ’s naked body from his 1993 molestation investigation. According to them, the late star has a right to privacy, and they don’t want the men to get a glimpse at his nudes.

New court docs obtained by TMZ show the company asking for Robson and Safechuck’s requests to be denied. While it’s not blatantly stated in the docs, the company seemingly suggests that they don’t want the photos out there. They think the alleged victims could try to publicize them. “Plaintiffs’ attempt to obtain this sensitive, private, and irrelevant information over this Court’s prior order to quash is particularly egregious,” the company adds.

Read More: Michael Jackson Estate Claims Thriller Jacket For Sale Is Actually A Fake

MJ’s Company Thinks Accusers Could Try To Publicize His Nudes

Michael Jackson’s Company Wants Accusers Blocked From Seeing Nudes
Michael Jackson at the The Helmsley Palace in New York City, New York (Photo by Ron Galella/Ron Galella Collection via Getty Images)

Robson and Safechuck are in the process of suing MJ’s corporations, accusing staffers of being responsible for their alleged abuse. Robson initially subpoenaed the records back in 2017 and was denied the following year. The request has now been revived, however, along with his and Safechuck’s lawsuits.

As for what else is brewing in the world of the late MJ, his estate also recently shut down an auction house’s claims that they’re selling his iconic “Thriller” jacket to the highest bidder. According to them, he only wore two jackets in the video. One of them was sold a decade ago for over 20 times what the fake jacket is listed for. What do you think of MJ’s company trying to block his alleged victims from accessing his criminal file? What about them arguing that they could see photos of his genitals? Share your thoughts in the comments section down below, and keep an eye on HNHH for more updates.

Read More: Katherine Jackson Net Worth 2024: What Is The Jackson Family Matriarch Worth?

[Via]

The post Michael Jackson’s Company Wants Accusers Blocked From Seeing Nudes appeared first on HotNewHipHop.

Vince McMahon Hit With Federal Subpoena

by

Last month, WWE executive chairman Vince McMahon had his home search and was served with a subpoena to appear before a federal grand jury. This reportedly stems from an SEC investigation into a reported hush money payment McMahon made. According to the claims, McMahon paid $3 million to a departing employee with whom he had had an affair. The news comes six months after McMahon settled a lawsuit filed by a former WWE referee who accused him of raping her in 1986.

McMahon, who is currently recovering from spinal surgery, appears to remain under investigation by the federal government. However, in the regulatory filing that reported the search, the WWE stated that no charges had been brought against McMahon at this time. At this time, it is not clear if or when McMahon will testify before the grand jury.

Read More: Vince McMahon rumored to be making more prominent return to the WWE

McMahon Proclaims Innocence

Vince McMahon
NEW YORK, NY – APRIL 04: Vince McMahon attends WWE Superstars for Sandy Relief at Cipriani, Wall Street on April 4, 2013 in New York City. (Photo by Brad Barket/Getty Images for WWE)

“In 2022, WWE formed a special committee to review allegations of misconduct against me,” McMahon said in a statement. “That review was concluded in November 2022 following an extensive investigation. Throughout this experience, I have always denied any intentional wrongdoing and continue to do so. I am confident that the government’s investigation will be resolved without any findings of wrongdoing.” In a separate statement, WWE said that it has “cooperated throughout and fully understands and respects the government’s need for a complete process.”

However, despite McMahon’s declaration of innocence, the investigation has completely reshaped the company at the top of pro wrestling. During the WWE’s internal investigation, McMahon resigned as CEO and later retired. However, McMahon remained as shareholder with controlling interest and returned to the company as “executive chairman” in January 2023. This led to the WWE merging with the UFC to great the $21 billion TKO Group Holdings. Endeavor Group Holdings, which currently owns the UFC, will have a 51% controlling share. Elsewhere, McMahon vowed to reimburse the WWE for all expenses relating to the investigation. At the time of writing, he has so far paid $17.4 million.

The post Vince McMahon Hit With Federal Subpoena appeared first on HotNewHipHop.

Boosie Badazz Laughs At XXXTENTACION Defense Lawyer Over Drake Subpoena

by

If you recall earlier this year, the trial for the murder of XXXTENTACION had everyone on the edge of their seats. Moreover, many waited five years since his death to see if he would get at least some form of justice for the killing, and they got it. However, one of the cases most notable developments came from the murderers’ defense lawyers, who tried to claim that Drake organized the whole attack. Furthermore, Boosie Badazz is the latest rapper to toss his hat into the ring of ridicule over that conspiracy. During a recent interview with DJ Vlad, the Baton Rouge MC reflected on that bizarre part of the legal battle.

“You get life if you kill a rapper,” Boosie began. “You ain’t gettin’ no years. Most of the time, especially if you’re this color [Black], you’re getting years. That’s just how it is. That s**t had me dying laughing, bro,” he said of the Drake subpoena attempts when asked by Vlad. “Yeah, they was reaching. I said, man, ‘I know they ain’t finna subpoena no f***in’ Drake.”

Read More: XXXTENTACION Killer Seeks New Trial, Blasts Judge

Boosie Scoffs At The Idea Of XXXTENTACION Murderers’ Defense Questioning Drake

Of course, the 40-year-old is far from the first person to comment on the defense’s claims from within the industry. Still, perhaps the most relevant and crucial takedown of the whole theory was the judge in the case himself, Michael A. Usan. “What does that have to do with someone who you have no evidence of being involved other than hearsay and innuendo?” Judge Usan scolded defense attorney Mauricio Padilla during one of his arguments. “You are now trying to just drag somebody in who’s a celebrity who does not want to be associated with this. And the harm to that individual is not inconsequential.

“At best, that would be adding an unindicted co-conspirator, if you will. But that’s not a defense to the individuals that are here,” he continued. In other updates concerning the trial, codefendant Robert Allen (who pleaded guilty and testified against his fellow suspects who are now serving life sentences) was recently sentenced to two more years in prison. For the latest updates and news on Boosie, Drake, and XXXTENTACION, stick around on HNHH.

Read More: XXXTENTACION’s “?” Turns 5: Revisiting The Late Rapper’s Album

[via]

XXXTENTACION Murder: Drake’s Attorney Wants Defense Sanctioned Over Deposition Request

by

Drake still hasn’t escaped the possible deposition surrounding XXXTENTACION’s murder. Drizzy faced numerous requests to be deposed in the case due to his feud with the late Florida rapper. Most recently, a process server attempted to subpoena Drake at his California mansion, only to be met by his security who refused to accept anything on his behalf. His bodyguards allegedly kicked the subpoena down the driveway afterward. “Drake’s staff believes that physically kicking the subpoena is a legally sound way of refusing service,” Dedrick Williams attorney, Mauricio Padilla, said. 

The judge ruled that Drake would have to sit down for some sort of deposition by Feb. 24th. Per Rolling Stone, on Feb. 17th, the judge stated that Drake’s attorney, Bradford Cohen, and the defense, Padilla, would have to “work together to mutually agree to a time that was convenient to Mr. Graham, agree on parameters for topics discussed at deposition and even stated that he would even consider sealing the deposition.” He added that they need to balance “the rights of the defendants to investigate the first degree murder case properly with Aubrey Drake Graham’s privacy issue.”

Drake’s Attorney Clashes With The Defense

Drake’s lawyer, Bradford Cohen, appeared in court this week where he formally addressed complaints from the defense surrounding the subpoena. Padilla said he tried to serve Cohen after asking if he would “accept service” on Drake’s behalf. However, Cohen allegedly refused. At this point, Padilla claimed that he “mentioned possibly asking for attorney’s fees, the metaphorical equivalent to kicking the subpoena down the driveway.” 

In response to Padilla, Cohen said that the attempt to expedite the deposition is “quite simply, legally unsound.” He added that they failed to properly serve Drake with the subpoena in accordance with California laws. “Counsel for the Defendant’s only logical motive in moving for an order to show cause a second time would have been to inject celebrity spectacle into an otherwise routine trial and generate headlines in the news,” Cohen told the court. Then, he asked the court to force Padilla to cover Drake’s attorney fees. We’ll keep you posted on any further updates surrounding the case.

XXXTENTACION Trial: Drake’s Armed Guards Accused Of Blocking Subpoena

by

The defense team in XXXTENTACION’s murder trial accused Drake and his camp of blocking a subpoena. Moreover, codefendant Dedrick Williams’ lawyer, Mauricio Padilla, filed a motion in Broward accusing Drizzy’s guards of dismissing the court order. According to the Miami Herald, the Friday (February 17) motion also includes a request for the rapper to attend a deposition to detail his involvement in X’s death. While many in the court seem to dismiss his supposed involvement, the defense team is adamant about needing his testimony. However, Broward Judge Michael Usan nulled an order on Tuesday (February 14) that would’ve called Drake for a virtual deposition on February 24.

TORONTO, ON – DECEMBER 27: Rapper Drake leaves the court following the NBA game between the Toronto Raptors and the LA Clippers at Scotiabank Arena on December 27, 2022 in Toronto, Canada. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Cole Burston/Getty Images)

Furthermore, the “Nice For What” artist faced contempt in court if the order remained and he didn’t show. Still, Padilla retained the ability to subpoena Drake after Judge Usan’s order. As such, he issued yet another motion asking authorities to require a deposition from the rapper. Also, he wants him held in contempt of court if he misses it. Even though a lack of evidence suggests otherwise, the attorney maintained that Drake had a hand in X’s death.

“The court explained the importance of balancing the rights of the defendants to investigate this first degree murder case properly with Aubrey Drake Graham’s privacy issues,” the motion read. “It was clear by the court’s ruling that he expected for the parties to work together and that despite entering the order vacating, that he expected the deposition to take place.” In addition, Padilla stated that Drake’s attorney, Bradford Cohen, refused to accept a subpoena for him to testify. Moreover, he claimed that armed guards at Drake’s California home prevented a servicer from handing the order.

Meanwhile, Cohen stated that Padilla exhibited a “lack of foundation” in his efforts. Furthermore, Law & Crime footage from Monday court proceedings (February 13) illuminates the process. For example, he explained that Padilla sent Drake an unsealed Zoom link and didn’t detail its conduction. Therefore, Cohen labeled the subpoena as “procedurally defective.” Whether Judge Usan accepts Padilla’s new motion on Tuesday (February 21) remains unknown. Regardless, come back to HNHH for the latest updates on Drake in the XXXTENTACION murder trial.

[via]