FDA Faces Scrutiny Over Mifepristone Decision: A Threat to Women’s Health

Screen Shot 2024 03 28 at 8.56.18 AM

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), in charge of safeguarding the safety of our food and drugs, finds itself embroiled in a legal battle as the U.S. Supreme Court prepares to hear arguments in a lawsuit against the agency. At the heart of this legal dispute lies the FDA’s decision regarding mifepristone, a high-risk drug used in medication abortion procedures. This decision, made despite acknowledged inadequacies in the supporting data and studies, has raised serious concerns about the welfare of hundreds of thousands of Americans impacted by its ramifications.

Mifepristone’s FDA-approved label warns of its potential dangers, with approximately one in 25 women facing the prospect of ending up in the emergency room after taking the drug. Recognizing these risks, the FDA initially instituted stringent safety measures, including mandatory in-person medical care with a licensed physician before and after taking the drug. These precautions aimed to detect life-threatening conditions like ectopic pregnancy and monitor for complications such as severe bleeding and infections.

However, in both 2016 and 2021, the FDA controversially eliminated these requirements, allowing for the distribution of mifepristone without ongoing in-person medical supervision. This decision came despite the drug’s Black Box warning highlighting the potential for “serious and sometimes fatal infections and bleeding.” What’s alarming is that the FDA based its decision on data and studies it openly admitted were unreliable and inadequate.

The FDA’s reliance on its Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to justify the removal of in-person requirements raises serious questions. The agency itself acknowledges that FAERS data alone are insufficient to determine a drug’s safety profile. Additionally, the FDA’s failure to address the absence of reporting requirements for non-fatal serious adverse events leaves a critical gap in monitoring and responding to potential risks associated with mifepristone use.

Moreover, the FDA’s reliance on studies evaluating mail-order dispensing of abortion drugs, despite their limitations and red flags, further undermines the credibility of its decision-making process. These studies revealed alarming rates of hospitalization and unplanned clinical encounters associated with mail-order dispensing, directly contradicting the FDA’s rationale for removing in-person requirements.

In light of these deficiencies, the FDA’s decision to authorize self-administration of mifepristone poses a grave risk to women’s health, exposing them to serious and life-threatening complications without adequate medical oversight. The agency’s failure to engage in reasoned decision-making, as required by the Administrative Procedure Act, highlights a troubling disregard for public safety.

The lawsuit challenging the FDA’s actions, supported by Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys and a coalition of doctors and medical associations, underscores the urgency of holding the agency accountable. These healthcare professionals, who witness firsthand the harms inflicted by the FDA’s recklessness, are advocating for the restoration of common-sense health and safety standards.

As the case heads to the Supreme Court, the American people deserve a federal government committed to evidence-based decision-making and prioritizing public health above all else. The FDA must not be allowed to jeopardize women’s health with insufficiently supported conclusions and inadequate rationales. It’s time to ensure that no agency is above the law, and that the FDA fulfills its duty to protect and promote the well-being of all Americans.

Watch below. Thoughts?

The post FDA Faces Scrutiny Over Mifepristone Decision: A Threat to Women’s Health first appeared on The Source.

The post FDA Faces Scrutiny Over Mifepristone Decision: A Threat to Women’s Health appeared first on The Source.

Wendy Williams’ Guardian Attempted to Halt Airing of Lifetime Documentary

Was ‘Where is Wendy Williams?’ Exploitative or Just Another Chapter in Williams Saga?

Former daytime talk show host Wendy Williams finds herself embroiled in a legal battle as her court-appointed guardian, Sabrina Morrissey, attempted to halt the airing of the Lifetime docuseries “Where Is Wendy Williams?” The controversy arose after Morrissey filed an emergency injunction just days before the series was set to premiere, citing concerns over her portrayal in the documentary.

According to reports from The Wrap, Morrissey initially took issue with the docuseries after viewing its trailer in February. Feeling apprehensive about how she would be depicted in the series, Morrissey filed a petition against A&E Networks to prevent the airing of the show. The move came as a surprise to many, given that Morrissey had been aware of the documentary’s filming for over a year.

In response to Morrissey’s actions, A&E Networks filed a legal defense arguing that her attempt to silence criticism of her role in Wendy Williams’ life was unconstitutional. The network contended that Morrissey had ample time to address any concerns she had about the documentary, as she had been aware of its existence since at least February 2023. Additionally, A&E’s legal team highlighted that Williams had been compensated for her participation in the series.

The unfolding legal drama sheds light on the complexities surrounding Williams’ personal and professional life, as well as the challenges faced by those tasked with overseeing her affairs. With the airing of “Where Is Wendy Williams?” potentially hanging in the balance, the dispute underscores the delicate balance between freedom of expression and the protection of individual rights.

Thoughts?

The post Wendy Williams’ Guardian Attempted to Halt Airing of Lifetime Documentary first appeared on The Source.

The post Wendy Williams’ Guardian Attempted to Halt Airing of Lifetime Documentary appeared first on The Source.

Concerns Arise for 90’s Rap Legend Keith Murray After Disturbing Video Surfaces

Screen Shot 2024 03 24 at 3.45.31 AM

In the world of hip-hop, Keith Murray stands as a towering figure, revered for his lyrical prowess and contributions to the genre during the golden era of the 1990s. However, recent events have left fans concerned for the well-being of the rap legend after a disturbing video surfaced on YouTube, depicting a humiliating encounter with a woman offering him money to rap.

The video, which has since sparked outrage and dismay among fans, shows Keith Murray appearing disoriented as a woman approaches him, holding a phone and offering him $20 to rap. In the footage, the woman can be heard shouting at Keith, urging him to perform, despite his apparent discomfort and attempts to cover his face.

“You are Keith Murray—you’re famous. You want $20?” the woman demands, as Keith struggles to respond. The scene unfolds in a public setting, leaving viewers shocked and saddened by the apparent degradation of a once-respected figure in the hip-hop community.

The video has prompted widespread concern and speculation about Keith Murray’s well-being, with many expressing worry for the rapper’s mental and emotional state. Fans have taken to social media to express their support for Keith and to call for greater awareness and understanding of mental health issues within the music industry.

The incident serves as a sobering reminder of the pressures and challenges faced by artists, particularly those who rose to fame during a time when the spotlight burned brighter and the stakes were higher. While Keith Murray’s contributions to hip-hop are undeniable, the video highlights the darker side of fame and the toll it can take on individuals.

As the hip-hop community grapples with the implications of the video, it is crucial to remember the importance of compassion and empathy in supporting artists who may be struggling behind the scenes. Mental health awareness and support should be prioritized, ensuring that those who have dedicated their lives to their craft receive the care and assistance they need to thrive.

In the wake of this troubling incident, fans continue to rally around Keith Murray, offering words of encouragement and solidarity. While the road to recovery may be long and challenging, there is hope that with the support of his fans and peers, Keith Murray can find the strength to overcome this difficult chapter and reclaim his rightful place as a legend of hip-hop.

Watch the video below,

The post Concerns Arise for 90’s Rap Legend Keith Murray After Disturbing Video Surfaces first appeared on The Source.

The post Concerns Arise for 90’s Rap Legend Keith Murray After Disturbing Video Surfaces appeared first on The Source.

Blueface’s Mom In Tears Over His Brother’s Mental Health Issues, Chrisean Rock Fans Drag Her

It’s no secret that Blueface’s mother and Chrisean Rock haven’t always gotten along. In recent days, however, Chrisean’s fans have been out in full force to defend her. Earlier this week, Karlissa Saffold took to Instagram Live to open up about her other son Dre’s current battle with his mental health. The stress of the situation left the worried mother in tears.

“I have done everything I can for him,” she explained. “Since before he went to jail… I was not privy to mental health. I mean, it might look like we’re doing some mental circus sh*t, but me and Blue are really just trying to create generation wealth for this family.” While most viewers can empathize with Saffold’s situation, others took the opportunity to drag her, reminding her of all the times she dissed Chrisean Jr. and his mom.

Read More: Chrisean Rock Accuses Wack 100 Of Sending Robbers To Blueface’s Home

Karlissa Saffold Says She’s “Done Everything” She Can For Dre

“So talking bout chrisean baby every other day then come on here crying WHO GONE TAKE YOU SERIOUS,” one user writes. Another says, “Karma for dragging Chrisean Jr.” In the past, Saffold has accused Chrisean Jr. of having a neurological disorder, such as fetal alcohol syndrome. For obvious reasons, this sparked outrage among Chrisean Rock’s fanbase. The Baddies star denies rumors that her son has a disability.

At the time of writing, it’s unclear exactly what kind of mental health issues Dre is dealing with. Last week, however, Wack 100 went live to tell fans that Blueface is doing alright following his fight behind bars. During his livestream, he claimed that Dre had spearheaded rumors that Blueface had been stabbed. Wack 100 says this is false, and the altercation was nothing but a minor “scuffle.” What do you think of Chrisean Rock fans calling out Karlissa Saffold after she got emotional about her son Dre’s mental health struggles? Share your thoughts in the comments section down below, and keep an eye on HNHH for more updates.

Read More: Chrisean Rock’s Ex-Stylist Seeks $1M Over “Baddies West” Premiere Punch

[Via]

The post Blueface’s Mom In Tears Over His Brother’s Mental Health Issues, Chrisean Rock Fans Drag Her appeared first on HotNewHipHop.

Wendy Williams’ Disturbing Documentary Sparks Outrage Over Revealed Payment

wendy

Former daytime talk show host Wendy Williams shocked fans last month when she was featured in a disturbing documentary on Lifetime titled “Where is Wendy Williams,” revealing her tragic diagnosis of dementia. However, new revelations have surfaced about the documentary, sparking outrage over the payment Wendy received for her participation.

According to exclusive reports by Radar Online, Wendy Williams was promised a shockingly low sum for her appearance in the documentary. Court documents obtained by Radar Online disclosed that the 59-year-old was slated to receive less than half a million dollars for her role in the four-part series.

The payment plan outlined in an 18-page contract allegedly signed by Wendy in early 2023 detailed that she would be paid $100,000 per episode. This meager compensation is in stark contrast to the substantial earnings Williams is accustomed to in her illustrious career.

What’s more, Wendy Williams was also provided with a daily $1,000 stipend to cover the costs of her grooming for the documentary. This revelation has only added fuel to the fire, with critics and fans alike condemning the exploitative nature of the project.

The documentary itself has been heavily criticized for its portrayal of Wendy Williams in the confusing throes of dementia. Critics have labeled it as exploitative, raising concerns about the ethics of profiting from Williams’ personal struggles.

Wendy Williams’ diagnosis of primary progressive aphasia and frontotemporal dementia, conditions that have tragically ended the film career of action hero Bruce Willis, adds another layer of gravity to the situation.

As the controversy surrounding “Where is Wendy Williams?” continues to unfold, questions arise about the treatment of celebrities facing health challenges and the responsibility of media organizations to uphold ethical standards in their productions.

Thoughts?

The post Wendy Williams’ Disturbing Documentary Sparks Outrage Over Revealed Payment first appeared on The Source.

The post Wendy Williams’ Disturbing Documentary Sparks Outrage Over Revealed Payment appeared first on The Source.

[WATCH] SOURCE SPORTS: John Wall Says He Considered Taking His Life After His Mom Died

Screenshot 2024 03 14 at 8.14.58 AM

On the most recent episode of The OGs Podcast hosted by Udonis Haslem and Mike Miller, former NBA star John Wall revealed how he struggled with his mental health and even put a gun to his own head on two separate occasions.

Wall said that after the passing of his mother in 2019, the depth and severity of his struggles with mental health became so acute that he sought help at his lowest points.

The loss of his grandmother and a year-long recovery from surgery for a ruptured Achilles made Wall’s struggles even more difficult. Despite his challenges, Wall found motivation in his two sons, realizing that taking himself away from them would mean failing them. He was adamant about the significance of seeking help, especially for Black men, encouraging anyone struggling to reach out for support.

The post [WATCH] SOURCE SPORTS: John Wall Says He Considered Taking His Life After His Mom Died first appeared on The Source.

The post [WATCH] SOURCE SPORTS: John Wall Says He Considered Taking His Life After His Mom Died appeared first on The Source.

Mo’Nique’s Son On Her Latest Comments: “What If I Would’ve Went In My Car & Blew My F*cking Brains Out?”

Mo’Nique’s son, Shalon Jackson, has responded to his mother’s going off during a recent comedy show. Jackson addressed the comments in an interview posted on TikTok. Mo’Nique had recalled meeting an old woman at an airport and the lady telling her “f*ck that n***a” in reference to her son.

“When you have 1.6 million followers and you win an Academy Award, you told the world that I was a ‘n***a,’” Jackson began. “You keep trying to make it about ‘f*ck me.’ You told the world that I was a ‘n***a’ and ‘f*ck him.’ My bills paid on time. My little girl runs to the door when she see hears me put that key in that door. And I’m a ‘n***a?’ Me and my woman figuring out our relationship everyday but I’m a ‘n***a?’ My girlfriend’s mother and I have a phenomenal relationship but I’m a ‘n***a.’ I ain’t never been in jail, never been in handcuffs but I’m a ‘n***a’ to the world? And you got Black women holding their phones saying ‘Ya, f*ck that little n***a.’”

Read More: Shalon Jackson Responds To Mo’Nique Posting Their Old Texts

Mo’Nique Performs In Atlanta

STOCKBRIDGE, GEORGIA – OCTOBER 14: Comedian Mo’Nique performs onstage during The Bridge Comedy Show at Stockbridge Amphitheater on October 14, 2023 in Stockbridge, Georgia. (Photo by Paras Griffin/Getty Images)

From there, he explained that he suffers from bipolar schizophrenia. He said: “They brought up my mental health. I am diagnosed bipolar schizophrenic without other delusional symptoms. I don’t know what the last part means but that’s what I’ve been diagnosed with before. When they brought up me potentially having a ‘mental episode,’ let’s say that’s the case. Let’s say that I was having a mental episode when they happened. You thought it was an intelligent idea to say ‘He’s mentally ill. He may be having an episode. Let’s post private text messages between us and my husband to the world.’” He concluded: “What if I would’ve went in my car and blew my f*cking brains out.” Check out his full comments below.

Shalon Jackson Fires Back At His Mom

 
 
 
 
 
View this post on Instagram
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

A post shared by the Jasmine BRAND (@thejasminebrand)

Jackson has been feuding with Mo’Nique since accusing her of not being interested in motherhood when he was a child. Be on the lookout for further updates on Mo’Nique on HotNewHipHop.

Read More: Mo’Nique Reveals The Type Of Woman She Wants Shannon Sharpe To Date

[Via]

The post Mo’Nique’s Son On Her Latest Comments: “What If I Would’ve Went In My Car & Blew My F*cking Brains Out?” appeared first on HotNewHipHop.

Comedienne Jess Hilarious Reflects on Regrettable Mockery of Chadwick Boseman’s Appearance

Screen Shot 2024 03 08 at 12.38.23 AM

Comedienne Jess Hilarious, co-host of the “Breakfast Club” morning show in NYC, has opened up about her regret for making fun of the late Chadwick Boseman’s gaunt appearance before his untimely death from colon cancer.

In a candid moment on “The Pivot Podcast,” Jess expressed remorse for her 2020 social media post where she mocked Chadwick’s weight loss, unaware of his terminal cancer diagnosis at the time. The beloved “Black Panther” actor had kept his health battle private, leaving the public in the dark about his struggle.

During the podcast episode, Jess explained her perspective at the time, thinking Chadwick had lost weight for an upcoming movie role. “I thought he was, you know, some people really get into the roles that they, you know, lose weight for a role or something like that,” she said. The episode of “Jess with the Mess” playfully commented on Chadwick’s appearance, not knowing the seriousness of his health condition.

Chadwick Boseman had shared a video before his passing, urging people to stay indoors amid the global circumstances. Jess, like many others, thought he was immersed in a movie role, not realizing the gravity of his situation.

“I riffed on him, and everybody thought it was funny and cool, even myself until he passed,” Jess admitted, recognizing the unintentional insensitivity of her comments. The actor’s frail appearance in a wheelchair outside a medical center shortly before his death captured the public’s attention.

Reflecting on the incident, Jess shared her internal struggle and realization. “I [didn’t even] care how people looked at me. How I looked at myself was crazy,” she confessed. The experience prompted her to reconsider her approach, understanding the impact of making assumptions about someone’s appearance without knowing the full story.

“For a minute, I didn’t want to do ‘Jess with the Mess’ no more because you don’t know what the hell people [are] going through, you don’t know when you come at somebody’s appearance… I just looked at him as a great actor,” Jess revealed, highlighting her newfound awareness about the importance of empathy and sensitivity.

“He was so unproblematic,” Jess added, emphasizing the regret she feels for inadvertently contributing to the mockery of a person who was silently facing a serious health battle. The incident serves as a powerful reminder of the need for compassion and understanding, even in the world of entertainment commentary.

The post Comedienne Jess Hilarious Reflects on Regrettable Mockery of Chadwick Boseman’s Appearance first appeared on The Source.

The post Comedienne Jess Hilarious Reflects on Regrettable Mockery of Chadwick Boseman’s Appearance appeared first on The Source.

Late CFO for Sherri Shepherd Show Accused of Embezzling $5 Million

Screen Shot 2024 02 28 at 9.59.26 AM

The Sherri Shepherd show has been thrust into the spotlight for all the wrong reasons. Last week, reports emerged revealing a deeply troubling financial scandal involving the show’s chief financial officer, Matt Uzzle, who tragically took his own life in the midst of an investigation into missing funds.

Uzzle, also overseeing financial matters for The Wendy Williams Show, has been implicated in the disappearance of a staggering sum, with estimates surpassing $5 million. The unraveling of this scandal has sent shockwaves through the entertainment industry and cast a shadow over both shows’ operations.

According to reports from The Sun, Uzzle, who served as the executive producer for Sherri Shepherd’s show, was found deceased on February 13 at his residence in Piermont, New York, in what appears to be a suicide. His untimely death has only deepened the mystery surrounding the missing funds and raised questions about the extent of his involvement.

Sources close to the investigation have shed light on the circumstances leading up to Uzzle’s demise. Following a serious accident, allegedly involving his motorcycle, Uzzle’s absence from work prompted colleagues to uncover alarming discrepancies in financial records. Bills remained unpaid, contracts with essential service providers were neglected, and suspicions arose regarding the mismanagement of funds.

Reports suggest that an internal investigation was launched into the financial irregularities, casting a cloud of suspicion over Uzzle’s actions during his tenure. It is believed that he was instrumental in overseeing the budget for both the Sherri Shepherd and Wendy Williams shows, making the magnitude of the missing funds all the more alarming.

The scale of the financial misconduct is staggering, with allegations pointing to Uzzle’s involvement in the disappearance of millions of dollars over an extended period. The revelation has sent shockwaves through the industry, tarnishing the reputation of the Sherri Shepherd show and raising concerns about financial oversight within the organization.

Amidst the turmoil, questions have emerged regarding the knowledge and complicity of higher-ups within the organization. With Uzzle’s longstanding tenure and close ties to senior management, speculation abounds about who knew what and when. The involvement of Debmar Mercury, the production company behind the Sherri Shepherd show, further complicates the matter, as parent company Lionsgate demands accountability for the missing funds.

As investigations continue and the fallout from this scandal unfolds, the Sherri Shepherd show finds itself embroiled in a crisis that threatens its integrity and future. The tragic loss of Matt Uzzle has left behind a trail of unanswered questions and a cloud of uncertainty hanging over the once-prominent daytime talk show.

In the wake of this turmoil, the entertainment industry grapples with the sobering reality of financial impropriety and the devastating toll it can exact, leaving behind shattered reputations and irreparable damage in its wake. As the investigation progresses, the full extent of the scandal’s impact remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: the fallout from this financial scandal will reverberate for years to come.

Thoughts?

The post Late CFO for Sherri Shepherd Show Accused of Embezzling $5 Million first appeared on The Source.

The post Late CFO for Sherri Shepherd Show Accused of Embezzling $5 Million appeared first on The Source.

Understanding Bank Account Freezes: When Mental Health Meets Financial Security

The 2020s Are the Years of Exciting Tech Advancements in Mental Health Treatment

In financial security and regulatory compliance, banks wield the authority to take specific measures to protect their institutions and clients. One such measure is freezing a bank account when there are suspicions that the account holder may be of unsound mind. While this action may seem invasive or arbitrary to some, it serves a vital purpose in safeguarding both the financial assets and the well-being of the account holder. Understanding the hows and whys behind this practice is essential for maintaining trust and transparency in the banking system.

Firstly, it’s crucial to grasp the circumstances under which a bank might consider freezing an account due to concerns about the account holder’s mental capacity. Banks are legally obligated to act in their clients’ best interests, including protecting individuals who may not be capable of making sound financial decisions. Instances where an account holder displays signs of cognitive impairment, such as dementia or severe mental illness, may prompt a bank to intervene. These signs could manifest as erratic transactions, confusion about financial matters, or requests that seem out of character or potentially harmful to the individual’s financial well-being.

Banks must assess the risk and take appropriate action when faced with such situations. Freezing the account temporarily allows the bank to investigate further without risking further financial harm to the holder. It’s important to note that freezing an account is not a punitive measure but rather a protective one aimed at preventing exploitation or financial mismanagement.

Freezing an account due to concerns about mental capacity typically involves several steps to ensure fairness and transparency. Banks may first attempt to contact the account holder or their designated representative to discuss the situation and gather more information. If necessary, they may also consult with legal and medical professionals to objectively assess the individual’s mental capacity.

Once the decision to freeze the account is made, the bank must notify the holder of the action taken and its reasons. This notification allows the individual or their representative to contest the decision if they believe it to be unjust or based on misinformation. Additionally, banks are often required to report such cases to relevant authorities, such as adult protective services or regulatory agencies, to ensure that vulnerable individuals receive the necessary support and protection.

While the idea of a bank freezing an account may initially evoke concern or frustration, it’s essential to recognize the broader implications of this practice. Banks play a vital role in preventing financial exploitation and abuse by taking proactive measures to safeguard the financial interests of vulnerable individuals. Moreover, freezing an account due to concerns about mental capacity can catalyze identifying and addressing underlying issues, such as cognitive decline or elder abuse, that may otherwise go unnoticed.

In conclusion, the decision to freeze a bank account based on concerns about mental capacity is a complex yet necessary aspect of financial regulation and consumer protection. By understanding the rationale behind this practice and the steps involved, individuals can appreciate the role that banks play in ensuring the security and well-being of their clients. Moreover, fostering open communication and cooperation between banks, account holders, and relevant stakeholders is essential for upholding trust and accountability in the financial system.

The post Understanding Bank Account Freezes: When Mental Health Meets Financial Security first appeared on The Source.

The post Understanding Bank Account Freezes: When Mental Health Meets Financial Security appeared first on The Source.